To the editor: Over the course of the past several weeks, The Journal has published a series of letters addressing the issue of LGTBQ “rights” and their application in a public school setting. The editor (and some readers) will be relieved to hear that I do not intend to continue ...

To the editor: Based on the 11/16/21 “Reality and Morality” letter to the editor, Mr. Thom appears to be confused by the difference between a “legal” and a “moral” argument. Legal arguments are based on laws/statutes, whereas moral arguments are based on an individual’s belief ...

To the editor: In recent months, the push for mandatory vaccinations has been increased substantially. Most media outlets push the Centers for Disease Control numbers to infections, symptomatic illnesses, hospitalizations and deaths. Most people do their own research and talk to people that ...

To the editor: This federal government which is not enforcing the law at the southern border of the United States is letting down the rights of its citizens. The government is to and has been established to secure the rights of its citizens. This duty is to protect the citizens against ...

To the editor: I would like to respond to the letter from Casey McMullen published on 11/13/21. In her letter Ms. McMullen makes two arguments: one based on law and the other based on morality. In her legal argument, Ms. McMullen makes reference to the state anti-bullying statute, which ...

To the editor: I would like to apologize for assuming Mr. Thom’s position was based on his religious beliefs; I am not privy to the complex inner workings of Mr. Thom’s mind. Now that he has clarified, I would like to acknowledge that his misunderstanding of the law is the basis of his ...