Poll Detail
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-5 | Post a comment
| shadow | |
|---|---|
|
05-25-08 7:21 PM
|
Just more government intrusion
|
| sunshine | |
|
05-22-08 7:18 PM
|
I THINK THE CITY SHOULD HAVE SIDEWALKS WHERE EVER HOUSES AND BUILT. I FEEL THAT THE CITIZENS THAT WERE AT THE MEETING THE OTHER NIGHT WERE OFF THE POINT OF THAT MEETING. THE PEOPLE THINK THEY ARE IN THEIR OWN LITTLE WORLD . REALLY THEY ARE IN THE CITY AND THEY SHOULD FOLLOW THE RULES AND REULATIONS OF THE CITY. ALL THE REST OF THE CITY HAS TO CONFORM, SO YOU CAN TOO. PEOPLE NEED TO BE SAFE FROM THE DRIVERS ANY WHERE IN THE CITY. I AM A BIG WALKER AND I WALK ALL OVER THE CITY .
|
| Zenrfanklib | |
|
05-22-08 9:59 AM
|
I think the city should first put sidewalks on all property owned by the city first, such as by the fairgrounds before they force regular citizens to.
|
| Spitzboo | |
|
05-21-08 12:55 PM
|
I approve of the city's policy of putting sidewalks along all streets as long as there are no exceptions to the policy. Lots of walkers out there in this city!
|
| Hippie | |
|
05-21-08 9:42 AM
|
I don't totally agree but if that is the city's master plan than okay. Who and how do they decide where to order in sidewalks. They seem to target some areas of town more than other for instance golf course area. It seems in that area when the houses were built sidewalks were never considered part of the master plan the city keeps referring to. How come these houses weren"t made to conform to the plan back then? Now when the city is trying to correct that mistake residents who have bought these houses don't want to abide.
|