Mobile Version: mobile.nujournal.com
RSS:
New Ulm Weather Forecast, MN
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified Web
News  Obituaries  Opinion  Agribusiness  Polls  Sports  Blogs  Communities  Industry of the Year  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries
Local News

Citizens sound off on plans for Riverside camping

Front Street residents, RockVam oppose proposal

By Ron Larsen Staff Writer
POSTED: November 4, 2009

NEW ULM - City councilors got an ear-full from several area residents about the Park & Recreation Department's proposed grant application to help fund development of primitive camping areas in Minnecon and Riverside parks during a public hearing on the subject Tuesday night.

The hearing was held on the department's plan to seek "Legacy" grant money for a project that the department feels would meet the grant requirement of having regional and/or statewide significance.

Because the Park Legacy Grant Program is one of the vehicles for dispensing monies collected as a result of a state sales tax increase for such programs, Park and Rec Director Tom Schmitz got his commission's approval for a plan to develop primitive camping areas in both parks and connect the two with a paved trail running along the river.

However, the plan - which is facing a deadline next week for submission of such plans for the first go-around in funding - quickly drew flack, not only from several people living near Riverside Park but also from Fourth Ward Councilor Ken RockVam.

His first concern was about whether there would be "fire rings" in the camping area.

"Yes, there would be, Councilor RockVam," Schmitz replied.

After several people had addressed the issue, RockVam asked City Attorney Hugh Nierengarten if he knew what primitive camping meant.

"I have no idea what the park and rec people mean [by primitive]," Nierengarten replied.

Schmitz stepped up to the podium to explain that, in essence outdoor camping without the "hook-ups" for campers that are available in upgraded camping areas. "Any kind of RV or camper can be in the area. It's just no utilities."

Dennis Born, who lives at 711 S. Front St., went to the podium to tell the council that he felt it would bring more people into the area and "police action will be required." He didn't mind the camping during River Blast, but "on a regular basis, no."

He stated that he doesn't oppose camping at Minnecon, and "I'd love to see picnic tables [in Riverside Park]. I think it should be maintained as a neighborhood park."

"It's peaceful and quiet [at Riverside Park], and it won't be that way with camping there," said Elaine Domeier, who lives at 301 S. Front St.

"We need green land, space. I can't see campers in Riverside. It will ruin Riverside," said John Fritsche, who lives at 827 S. Front St.

Then, Councilor Ruth Ann Webster, who has Riverside Park in her First Ward, asked Scott Sparlin, a New Ulm resident who is an advocate for getting and maintaining a cleaner Minnesota River to comment.

"I think camping in the [Riverside] park is alright. When a park is used, it polices itself. There's a lot of pluses to it. I think there will be a lot of people who will be drawn to New Ulm by the camp sites. You have to weigh the positives and the negatives, and there really aren't any negatives [to this proposal]," Sparlin said.

Sparling's comments brought Born back to the podium.

"To ruin Riverside Park for some imagined need is just not right. I think this will be a major downgrade for the park," Born said.

At this point, City Manager Brian Gramentz jumped into the fray.

"I don't see the camp [units[ covering all three blocks. If we don't do the Riverside [camp sites], then the trail [that would connect Minnecon and Riverside] isn't strong [for getting the funding]."

That brought Bruce Potter, who lives at 104 S. Front St. up to the podium. "I don't want that to happen to [getting camp sites in] Riverside."

After some discussion among the councilors, Councilor Les Schultz offered the resolution to authorize proceeding with submitting the two grant applications to the state. That motion fails.

Webster then offered a successful motion that laid the matter over until Tuesday, Nov. 10, at 5 p.m. when the council will take another look at the proposal which may be revised somewhat by staff.

In other action, the council:

Approved the ordinance creating an Art and Collections Advisory Board to oversee the handling of artifacts that have been presented, and may be presented in the future to the city.

Gave first reading to ordinances which set the schedule of city fees for 2010 and would allow theaters in which there are live performances to sell wine.

Ron Larsen can be reached at rlarsen@nujournal.com

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-13 | Post a comment
shellykane
11-16-09 4:44 PM
Minecon Park would be okay for primitive camping because it is not good for much else anyhow. There is even a bathroom already. I think Riverblast will end up getting to big for it's britches. =============================== <a href="***********discountcampertrailers****.au" rel="dofollow">camper trailers</a>

themnkid
11-05-09 9:36 PM
If people camp they are not going to spend money locally. They are staying at a campground where they make their own food & bring their own entertainment. It is not a hotel.

HopeMaria
11-05-09 10:40 AM
What violence in the park vikingfan? I have never heard of any such issues. Please cite examples.

In discussions I have had with others regarding the cities latest attempt to fix something that isn't broken, is this. You have a rustic campground with no water or electric, no restrooms, etc. Who is going to camp there? Families with children? Probably not. You are going to see young kids pitching tents and boozing it up, casuing problems. I wonder if the city is going to be responsible the first time some punk kids gets drunk and drowns in the river.

vikingfan
11-04-09 10:34 PM
Do you people realize that New Ulm is one of the few cities without a municipal campground? Perhaps violence in this park would be curbed with campers occupying the park. Flandrau State Park is a wonderful facility but often full every weekend. Why not bring more people to New Ulm to spend money to support our local businesses?

svensota
11-04-09 8:13 PM
We need to get a "big city feel" around here. Enough of our podunk thinking. Let's go up to the Twin Cities and get in touch with some certified homeless people and a few wacked out drugies, and then have them come down here and live in Riverside Park. Next thing ya' know we'll get an interstate highway!

themnkid
11-04-09 6:08 PM
I propose we put permanent campsites on the hill.

HopeMaria
11-04-09 12:49 PM
I also know a lot of people run their dogs in the park. Would they have to worry about broken glass, fire pits still smoldering? The whole idea is simply a BAD IDEA!!

HopeMaria
11-04-09 12:41 PM
My worry is the garbage and the mess that will be left behind. Also, there are no bathrooms at Riverside. Do we have to look at porta-potties all day long? Or are they going to destroy more of the park and build bathrooms? Leave Riverside alone. You want rustic camping, Minecon is your place. You won't disturb residents, there is already a bathroom and shelter.

middleclassworker
11-04-09 12:02 PM
I'm neutral on the whole thing...what about just allowing tenting? I don't think it should be opened up to vehicles or campers. I would say that even if there was tenting allowed, that the vehicles should remain on the street. Let people bring their campers to Flandrau.

HopeMaria
11-04-09 8:45 AM
I agree Hippie, camping at Minecon, fine. Camping during Riverblast, fine. But on a regular basis at Riverside - it will be nothing but trouble.

Hippie
11-04-09 8:41 AM
Minecon Park would be okay for primitive camping because it is not good for much else anyhow. There is even a bathroom already. I think Riverblast will end up getting to big for it's britches.

Hippie
11-04-09 8:36 AM
Leave Riverside park alone. It is a perfect place to let the grandkids run free. With campers there it would ruin the scenery of the open grass and the river meeting just like it was a hundred years ago. I agree it's okay during Riverblast but I just think the city is looking for more places for tourist to stay during their visits ( Flandrau State Park is for that!!)

HopeMaria
11-04-09 8:23 AM
Why on earth would the city want to ruin Riverside Park with "primitive" camping. It is a beautiful, quiet, peaceful area that should be left alone.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
News  Obituaries  Opinion  Agribusiness  Polls  Sports  Blogs  Communities  Industry of the Year  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries