Mobile Version: mobile.nujournal.com
RSS:
New Ulm Weather Forecast, MN
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified Web
News  Obituaries  Opinion  Agribusiness  Polls  Sports  Blogs  Communities  TV Book  Industry of the Year  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries  Subscription

Nicollet County panel OKs permit for meteorological tower

Issue advances for county board approval

By FRITZ BUSCH Journal Staff Writer
POSTED: September 16, 2008

ST. PETER - After more than two hours of discussion Monday night, the Nicollet County Planning and Zoning Advisory Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit for the New Ulm Public Utilities to erect a 198-foot meteorological (met) tower several miles southwest of Lafayette.

The resolution came on a 49-11 criteria vote with 13 conditions.

Perhaps the most noteworthy of which was the final one, that a wind turbine project could not be approved until 10 months after the met tower is collecting data.

The first nine months of met tower data must be sent to the Nicollet County Environmental Services Office.

Commissioner Tim Waibel had reservations about the met tower and wind turbine project that could follow.

"I seriously believe you're seriously impacting the lives of many people here," he told NUPU.

In their Findings of Fact criteria votes on 10 questions, Commissioners voted 4-2 that given the nature of the land, the requested use was not compatible with the general welfare, public health and safety, the surrounding area and will depreciate nearby properties.

Commissioner Jim Gleisner abstained since NUPU Director Gary Gleisner is his brother.

Nicollet County resident Nancy Reinhart said she was concerned about taxes, land values and health.

"Setbacks are being re-written after residents suffered from many health issues," Reinhart said.

Jeff Franta and Clete Goblirsch gave a detailed Powerpoint presentation on wind turbine shadow effects (light flicker) caused by blades moving between the sun or moon and nearby residences and other issues.

"It's like turning a light switch on and off. We need responsible (wind turbine) setback parameters," Franta said.

Pat Wrase, NUPU Engineer, said the Nicollet County wind turbine setback was 750 feet while the state requirement was 500 feet.

Kim Reinhart said wind turbine health affects included chronic sleep disturbance, depression, vertigo, nausea and more seizures for people so afflicted.

Others at the meeting talked about livestock issues including stray voltage, cancer, low milk production and still births.

Wrase said the met tower was needed for more data to determine if the site near Lafayette would provide enough wind for turbines to be productive.

"All we're asking for is a met tower permit. Wind turbines would have to go through another permit process. We'd be willing to do a flicker analysis," Wrase said.

Gary Gleisner said NUPU is under "constant pressure" from local 3M and Kraft plants to reduce energy costs and that many rural residents work at the plants.

Wrase added that state conservation mandates require cities to use more and more renewable energy in five-year increments beginning in 2006.

He added that solar and biomass energy including burning RDF (refuse-derived fuel) is being considered by NUPU but other renewable fuels are currently less cost-effective than wind energy.

Wrase said NUPU buys non-renewable power from Excel Energy. Renewable power is available from Excel but at a higher rate, he added.

Nicollet County Commissioners plan to act on the Planning & Zoning recommendation on Tuesday, Sept. 23.

(Fritz Busch can be e-mailed at fbusch@nujournal.com).

Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-5 | Post a comment
nucitizen00001
09-19-08 2:58 PM
com

nucitizen00001
09-19-08 2:58 PM
wordpress.

nucitizen00001
09-19-08 2:58 PM
newulm.

nucitizen00001
09-19-08 2:57 PM
Please visit and post your comments on newulm.wordpress****

You can actually put links to the websites you reference.

greeniebeanie
09-16-08 8:53 PM
A 500 foot setback is too close for any machine that is 40 stories tall and in motion to be from a person's home. This is outrageous. Google "Byron Wisconsin, Wind Turbine Shadow Flicker, You Tube" to see what the chief of the town of Byron fire department is going through because of a turbine 1100 feet from his home. And look at all of the You Tube postings from betterplanWI to see interviews with people who are living with turbines right now. These big machines do not belong near people's homes, bird migration fly ways or bat migration flyways. On top of this, they are the only renewable energy option that absolutely must rely on a fossil-fuel burning power plant to even function. Because of this, studies in Denmark and our on National Academy of Sciences have determined that wind power's reduction of CO2 is negligible. there is a website out of Wisconsin that has a lot of information about the people who are living with this. It's called Better Plan, Rock County, Wiscons

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
News  Obituaries  Opinion  Agribusiness  Polls  Sports  Blogs  Communities  TV Book  Industry of the Year  Classifieds  Jobs  CU Galleries  Subscription