Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Public Records | Contact Us | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS

Obama trots out fear tactics again

January 18, 2013

Two years ago President Barack Obama warned that unless he got his way from Congress with an unqualified increase in the national debt ceiling, terrible things would happe....

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Jan-18-13 5:18 PM

Times debt ceiling raised & Percent: 18 & 199% -Reagan; 4 & 48%- Bush Sr; 4 & 44%-Clinton; 7 & 90% - Bush Jr; 3 & 26%- Obama. Republicans also voted to raise the debt ceiling by $6 trillion by voting for the budget written by Paul Ryan. So they actually do understand the need to pay existing debt. But they’ve become adrenaline junkies who can’t stop playing chicken, so we do face the real damage that would come with them forcing default; making it easy to “portray” them as irresponsible.

Since the start of 2011 Obama has signed off on $2.4 trillion in spending cuts. Not a penny of new revenue increases came until the fiscal cliff deal of $600 billion. That’s a 75% to 25% ratio, but of course, there have been “no cuts”.

Irony continues with the party trying to sell us on giving up Social Security as a Ponzi scheme being concerned with payments being missed. So raise the cap – and those promised jobs, jobs, jobs would help too.

7 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-18-13 10:38 PM

Ah, such a joy to quote The Journal directly:

"He got his way..."

"Obama won..."

"He's won every time..."

Yup, he sure is a winner. He is THE winner.


Happy Inauguration, ya'll.

Four more glorious semi-liberal years!


4 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-19-13 2:17 AM

One would think the editors would do some fact checking....not a "they" say point of view..........Oh, my, I guess that's why I don't waste money on this rag.

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-19-13 8:38 PM

Empty: You find the past quite relevant to the issue of gay marriage…

The point of mentioning previous administrations is that where we are is not due to just the current administration, despite fear tactics used to convince people it is...and used to convince them that the destruction of America is Obama’s goal, the destruction of civil society is a homosexual plot, limiting ammo clips and assault weapons is taking away the 2nd amendment, Social Security is a Ponzi scheme, allowing only private prayer and not organized prayer in schools is banning God, health care reform is socialism if not communism, and on and on. The Republican party is led by those who present every issue in the most extreme terms - to frighten people and get them angry. Nonstop scare tactics. Talk about destructive.

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-19-13 9:13 PM

I know a little something about economics. So here's a very short, free lesson.

I know there are four sectors of spending. I know that they are: consumer, corporate, export and government.

I know that when corporate doesn't spend and consumers don't spend, that leaves two sectors: export and government. Export makes up a very small percentage of GNP.

Guess what's left?

If that sector (government) slashes and cuts and sits on its hinder, we go into a deeper recession/depression. Just ask the Europeans how well their austerity strategies are working for them.

The first thing we have to do is get OUT of the recession, THEN we make budgets that are balanced and make sense and have a surplus--like that tax-and-spend Democrat, Bill Clinton. Not the war-and-tax breaks Republican, Doofus "W".

That wasn't hard, was it?

End of lesson.

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-19-13 10:40 PM

Clinton was not a Tax-and-Spend Democrat. He was a Tax-and-Pay-Bills Democrat. There is a difference.

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 1:28 AM

Dang right, MCW. That was my point. But, I should have put "tax-and spend" in quotes. I was just being...sardonic.

As Auntydem points out, the GOPpers are no saints when it comes to running up the public debt.

Now, Bill Clinton, he was a saint.

Oops, there I go again.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 1:31 AM

MIT: Only you are honorable, obviously.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 1:39 AM

MIT: Ah, for the "invisible hand" of capitalism.

You have been nicely sheep-dipped in right wing economic theory. If your economic tactics are so correct how do you explain the debacle in Europe? We are far ahead of those fine folks in the recovery.

It's all relative, my wooly friend.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 8:45 AM

So tell me MT how electing the party that wants to eliminate minimum wage, child labor laws, overtime, unions, many banking and Wall Street rules, corporate taxes, public school get my going to allow you and me to have a good life?

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 11:24 AM

The past is relevant. Regan tripled the deficit, Bush doubled it. The lowest spending president in 50 years is obama. Silly humans.

2 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 2:16 PM

Now, MIT, "there you go again".

You are throwing out absolutes when more subtle variations on a theme are what happens, and happened.

I would strongly argue that saving General Motors and Chrysler and three million jobs (yeah, yeah, lets niggle that number for 42 posts) was money well spent. Ditto the stimulus money/projects, only we didn't spend enough to fully prime the economic pump due to the usual Republican obstructionism.

What all you Austrian economist lovers and dewy-eyed post-Reaganites forget was the mental state of the economic system when it almost collapsed in 2008, and in the 1930's, especially. (Think Fascism, Communism, "A New Wave", Chuck Lindbergh, the KKK, et al.)

There is a political component to Keynesian thinking as well as an economic one. The markets are based on confidence. Sometimes it needs to be propped up significantly to avoid total disaster.

You GOPper/TPers always dismiss that component in the pretend-world you so long to liv

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 3:10 PM

I'm glad you asked, MT. Newt Gingrich was one of the many who spoke in support of eliminating child labor laws. In fact, he called them "stupid". Missouri Senator Jane Cunningham also wants to accomplish this. Proposed legislation in Maine would have ended the limit on the amount of hours worked by a minor. The list goes on and on.

I don't need to give you examples of republicans that want to eliminate minimum wage. Google gave me over 5.3 million links on the subject.

As far as eliminating unions, you had Mitt Romney, MN State senator Dave Thompson, MN Rep. Steve Drazkowski, Governor Walker, to name a few.

I guess I don't get how you can honestly say that you don't see what is going on around you.

4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 3:14 PM

Maybe part of the problem is that none of the people in the banking industry that were part of this mess ever saw one day of prison time.

4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 3:15 PM

Svensota, don't you know that the government's role in stimulating an economy is to go to war, sometimes two? Handing out tax cuts and borrowing money from China at the same time works even better.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 3:22 PM

Please name one Republican who advocates eliminating minimum wage.----------Ron Paul was asked “Do you advocate getting rid of a minimum wage?” and replied, “ Absolutely, and it would help the poor.” Michele Bachmann - “Literally, if we took away the minimum wage— if conceivably it was gone — we could potentially virtually wipe out unemployment completely.” Republican John Raese of West Virginia (candidate for president ) advocated ending minuimum wage laws.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 3:42 PM

Name one republican who wants to eliminate unions.-----------“I love that we are one of the least unionized states in the country…We don’t have unions in South Carolina because we don’t need unions in South Carolina…And we’ll make the unions understand full well that they are not needed, not wanted, and not welcome.” Nikki Haley, SC gov, who also spoke against unions in her speech at the Republican convention.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 4:08 PM

Please name one republican who wants to eliminate child labor laws.------- Missouri State Senator, Jane Cunningham (R), introduced S.B. 222 which eliminates age requirements for child labor, restrictions on hours worked, restrictions on industries where they may work, and removes the authority of the state Labor Division to inspect records on child employees.

Wendy Long GOP candidate for US Senate (NY) held the Tea Party view that child labor laws, overtime, minimum wage, and labor protections in general are unconstitutional. The Congressional Tea Party caucus had 59 members (all GOP) prior to the recent elections. Member Sen. Mike Lee has called child labor laws unconstitutional.

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 4:30 PM

Tongue tied, MT?

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 4:52 PM

Michael is looking in his Bible right now for a verse that says that workers should not have rights, that slavery is a good thing.

5 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 5:28 PM

The problem with your live of right to work us that the unions are still legally required to represent the workers who chose to not pay dues. Will the Chamber of Commerce represent a business that doesn't become a member?

My mother in law is a Walker supporter and was a union worker in the public health care industry. he was not living high on the hog before, mind you. They have now taken away Saturday overtime from her, but she still has to work (for straight time). Why didn't Scotty take the right to collective bargaining away from police officers?

Public unions are just a start, private ones will be next. Then you will see distinguished companies like Kraft and 3M who realize that if they compensate their workers fairly, the unions will stay away, begin to lower the compensation packages of their workers.

Hold on Michael, we're in for a wild ride. The early 1900's will resurface.

4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 5:30 PM

Empty: And yet Haley repeatedly said "unions", Bachmann and Paul did not stutter, and at least one republican (as you requested) proposed a law to end child labor laws in her state. I believe that puts her in the "against" column.

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 8:45 PM

MIT-O-Honorable-One: Please forgive me. Your analysis of the European economic situation versus the United States was enlightening.

I didn't realize that all the numbers were backwards, as you so carefully pointed out, because they are on celsius and we are on fahrenheit.

Oh, my gosh, had I only known!

Keep up the insightful thinking!!!

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-20-13 10:17 PM

Empty: You stated "Obama is pushing the country to economic collapse, which is exactly what some people feel he is trying to do." Did you research his exact statements to see if he is being misrepresented, or did you just accept that one?

4 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jan-21-13 9:03 AM

Empty: I see. You can simply divine political opponents’ actual motives, so something to back it up is not necessary for you, even as you demand it for what others say. You simply reject actions of republicans which match their stated positions as other people's inability to understand nuances. That makes it easy for you to ignore facts that interfere with your opinion and put down the people who disagree. We get it.

2 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 32 comments Show More Comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web